Moreover, few if any of the citations seem to involve either advocating overthrow of the government or expression “having a tendency to cause an immediate breach of the peace.” The entire situation involves systematic abuse of police authority.
This article is the conclusion of a six-part series, “Constitutional Changes to restore American Democracy: Reforming the U.S. Senate and ending the Imperial Presidency.” Click here to read Part One: “The Undemocratic U.S. Senate.” Due to continuing population...
This article is the fifth part of a six-part series, “Constitutional Changes to Restore American Democracy: Reforming the U.S. Senate and ending the Imperial Presidency.” Click here to read Part One: “The Undemocratic U.S....
To protect the interests of citizens of small-population states, the constitutional amendment that reforms the Senate should include a clause that bars Congress from making a law that has a discriminatory effect upon a citizen of a small-population state or states, when not “substantially related” to furthering an “important public purpose.”
This article is the third part of a six-part series, “Constitutional Changes to Restore American Democracy: Reforming the U.S. Senate and ending the Imperial Presidency.” Click here to read Part One: “The Undemocratic U.S....
One happy result of placing all power in one body that cannot shift it’s responsibility to anyone else is that British people vote in elections, since their representative in Parliament may literally determine what is and isn’t law in the U.K. Since the soldiers returned from World War I, voter turnout in national elections has never been lower than 59.4%. After all, if you live in a so-called “marginal constituency,” your choice for “M.P.” may not only decide which party makes all the laws, but who becomes prime minister, since the P.M. is the leader of the party with the most seats in Commons.
Constitutional Changes to Restore American Democracy: Reforming the U.S. Senate and ending the Imperial Presidency
Syndicated columnist Joe Matthews proposed last week that campaigning to change the U.S. Constitution to restore democratic stability to the U.S. would be a better alternative for Californians than pressing for independence now. At the least, Matthews argues, this would satisfy world opinion that California is restoring her independence only after using all her power to reform the U.S. Constitution.
Consistent with my obligation as a lawyer to support necessary legal reforms, here are the most significant of my recommendations for strengthening democracy by reforming the U.S. Constitution.
Una coalición de grupos que apoyan la independencia de California presentó un proyecto de ley el 3 de julio para una ley propuesta que podría conducir a un “¿Deberíamos quedarnos o irnos?” vote en 2022. Los organizadores de la campaña esperan que el tiempo para que los californianos recopilen firmas para la iniciativa de secesión de California comenzará durante las ocho semanas previas a las elecciones presidenciales de 2020.
A coalition of groups supporting independence for California will submit a draft initiative this Friday for a proposed law that could lead to a “Stay or Go?” vote in 2022. The campaign organizers expect that the time for Californians to collect signatures for the California secession initiative will begin during the eight weeks before the 2020 presidential election.